Friday, 31 August 2012

Krishnamurti on What We can do in this World


Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hkx1njE95fs

As per Krishnamurti, the question of human responsibility is not easy, but it can be understood by starting with some basics which we need to ingrain in ourselves deeply. Then, we can freely enquire into the question of what our responsibility as a human being is. 

1. The first is the power to observe with deep attention, but without jumping to conclusions, getting depressed, or taking sides. We need to observe things going on in the world, but without merely taking sides or getting depressed, etc. He goes on the describe the world as a place with great advancements in technology, but with uncertainty in the economic and social environment, and with destructive attutides being cultivated the world over through wars and through parochial attitudes - including patriotism, which for Krishnamurti, had turned into nothing but glorified tribalism. 

He clarifies that this observation is different from analysis, and does not necessarily involve tearing things to pieces. Like when we look at a flower - we first notice the sheer beauty of it, and only then does the analysis start. That kind of simple, but deep attention is needed. Later, he goes further and says that even the distance between "what is" and "what should be" is a division which creates conflict. To see with deep attention is to see without conflict, and so, we need the quality of attention where even the difference between the analyzer and the analyzed vanishes, he says. I don't think K ever tries to say that technology or analysis don't have their place in our lives. In fact, he starts with these things as necessities which are of obvious importance. Just that in the field of this larger enquiry on human responsibility, what is needed, he says, is that quality of deep attention where one can see without conflict.  

2. The second prerequisite is to deeply understand the common background that all human beings  share, underneath our divisions of nations, races, etc. This is the common experience of anxiety, sorrow, loneliness, a search for something beyond (whether we call it God or something else), the feeling that our consciousness is uniquely ours, etc. Countries might differ peripherally due to better food or even slightly better governance, but underneath these divisions is the common shared experience of all human beings. Even if our brains refuse to accept it, we must accept the irrefutable fact of these experiences being common to all of us. In that sense, "we are the world" and our problems are more similar than dissimilar. 

He adds that even when we think about what our responsibility is, we tend to think in terms of our individual isolated selves, which is wrong because we are again creating a division which is not deep attention. He says that it is important that people do this enquiry together the entire world over, because otherwise there is a tendency for a lone voice of sanity to get submerged in the confusion and commotion of the rest of mankind.

Once we completely lay down this foundation of observing what's going on without conflict and understand deeply how similar people are in their emotional consciousness (beneath superficial physical differences) then the mind would be ready to enquire into what we can do in this situation of today's.  

Finally, Krishnamurti mentions the power of this deep attention in the context of problems of everyday life. If you are angry, see this anger within yourself without thinking of yourself as being different from the anger and without various such escapist thoughts. In doing this, the mind gets cleaned of anger. If you have been hurt by somebody, look deeply at what the hurt is doing to you (i.e., its consequences), and the "flame of attention" will cleanse the wound. If you are in a relationship, enquire whether it is based mainly on a need or a dependency (rather than on love). Ask whether love is possession or whether attachment is love? All action due to a motive (dependency, need for gratification, etc.), he says, leads to conflict at some level and must end somewhere. Cause-less love, on the other hand, seems to be the one thing which is eternal. 

Sadanand Tutakne


No comments:

Post a Comment