To those who want to
believe, the problem of the food chain is often a tough paradox in the sense
that it seems to be a very basic evidence of brutality and violence being part
of "God's creation". So is God responsible for killing and is the food
chain evidence of this?
I don't know how God would
reply, but in the context of Man - who has the capacity to feel deeply and also
the intelligence to do something about it - we see that there have been cases
where the problem of food has also been resolved without killing - at least the
kind of killing we normally talk about.
1. Tulsidas, it is said in
books, survived 12 years on leaves fallen on the ground, probably because the
thought of killing plants for food was not acceptable to him. Well, maybe he
didn't care about microbes, but at least he avoided killing plants and animals
in the name of food.
2. Giri Bala, a widow who
could not bear some remarks made by her family regarding her food habits,
confided in a yogi about the problem. She was given a yogic practice which she
did with all her zeal, and it is said (in Autobiography of a Yogi) that she
survived only on water and sunlight till her ripe old age. Her unique
achievement made her a revered figure in her area, but that is a different
issue. Maybe the villagers did not know of Sir Jagadish Bose's discovery that
even metals display some qualities of life and respond to stimuli in ways that
can be called intelligent. If the world is thoroughly imbued with
"chaitanya", any eating (even metals) will involve a change of the
eaten material which would be akin to killing. However, she did show them a way
to live without killing - at least the way we undertand the word normally.
3. Another catholic saint -
I believe the name is Therese Neumann - also survived on water and just one
consecrated wafer a day, as per "Autobiography of a Yogi".
4. In a famous episode, a
hatha yogi stayed buried underground for 40 days without food or water, and
resumed normal life once this demonstration to the king (Ranjit Singh) was complete.
All these people,
intentionally or unintentionally, solved the problem of killing for food, at
least the way we understand the word "killing" in usual discussions
(brutality, insensitivity, etc.). If scientists were to really get down to it,
couldn't we have had some kind of "photosynthesis equipment" ready by
now, to resolve the problem of killing? Or, a food processing industry based on
leaves and fruits fallen to the ground?
Brutality and violence are
therefore not necessarily from God. Maybe the truth is that the problem has
never been important enough for society as a whole to find a way out. If it
was, then the above cases suggest that a solution would probably have been found
already.
Sadanand Tutakne
No comments:
Post a Comment